Martes, Mayo 24, 2011

2004 Ford Freestar Minivan

2004 Ford Freestar Minivan. Ford Freestar Minivan. 2004
  • Ford Freestar Minivan. 2004


  • wnurse
    Sep 18, 01:55 PM
    Are they any good? I've never seen a phone with a good camera, 10MP phone sounds like 10MP of grainy nasty pictures to me.


    By definition, 10MP phone cannot be as grainy as a 3MP phone. You do realize when someone says 10MegaPixel phone what they mean right?.
    10 million pixels per square inch (before the tech police come out, this is a basic definition. I am aware an image does not have to be a square).




    2004 Ford Freestar Minivan. 2004 FORD FREESTAR MINIVAN 7 PASSENGERS 2004 Ford Freestar SE 4 Door Van
  • 2004 FORD FREESTAR MINIVAN 7 PASSENGERS 2004 Ford Freestar SE 4 Door Van


  • lmalave
    Sep 27, 09:56 AM
    Geez, I hope it doesn't look like that. Rotary looks kool, but imagine trying to text or dial without looking.

    Yeah, seriously - there's no way!!!

    Text Messaging is way too popular now to mess with the key layout.

    Really, the only viable options are:

    1) standard numeric keypad
    2) QWERTY keyboard
    3) Hybrid QWERTY keyboard (a la Blackberry 7100 or Blackberry Pearl, though RIM probably has a patent on this...)




    2004 Ford Freestar Minivan. 2004-Ford-Freestar-SEL
  • 2004-Ford-Freestar-SEL


  • nosen
    Sep 14, 08:16 AM
    Hmmm, an Aperture update would be cool. I wonder if they would make any financial "concessions" to people who have recently purchased Aperture... :o




    2004 Ford Freestar Minivan. My 2004 Ford Freestar Minivan
  • My 2004 Ford Freestar Minivan


  • smazany
    Jul 14, 11:52 AM
    I just bought a Macbook, what does this news mean to me? How much more powerful is Conroe compared to my own Core Duo? Can anyone direct me to some benchmarks of Conroe that are being put against the Core Duo?




    2004 Ford Freestar Minivan. 2004 Ford Freestar SEL in
  • 2004 Ford Freestar SEL in


  • Leej
    Sep 26, 10:12 PM
    Already have a Cingular deal. Sweet!




    2004 Ford Freestar Minivan. The FORD FREESTAR
  • The FORD FREESTAR


  • jeff1977
    Mar 29, 02:24 PM
    Just FYI...

    File size wouldn't affect performance at all, as long as you're copying between locations on the same drive. The "file" that you see in the GUI is actually a link to a location on disk where your data is; all the OS has to move is the link, which is very tiny.

    Thanks for clarifying that for me! I don't like doing things that I'm not sure about. As I said, my being unsure stemmed from windows that would sometimes come up in older versions of Photoshop, when closing, that mentioned clipboard sizes being too large. Or something along those lines. Again, thanks.




    2004 Ford Freestar Minivan. 2004-Ford-Freestar-SEL
  • 2004-Ford-Freestar-SEL


  • MattSepeta
    Apr 20, 04:44 PM
    For all the bleeding heart liberals I've spoken with over the years, who want crazy amounts taxed in order to support social uplift programs, I never see any of them giving away 50+% of their income to charity. It's a lot easier to ask the government to give other peoples money to charity.


    Sure is. A hypothetical I like to propose:

    Considering that the discrepancies between "rich" and "poor" as far as voting goes are far over blown (http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/24/even-more-on-income-and-voting/) (Rich DO vote liberal and poor DO vote conservative) with the top third of white income earners STILL voting liberal, despite their high incomes and the ever-pervasive myth that rich people vote republican.

    If this top third of income earners, instead of trying to legislate their charities through democratic votes and the force of law, simply put 50%, 60%, 70%, hell, 90% of their incomes towards charity rather than owning a home, owning multiple vehicles, owning boats, "traveling", shopping at Lunds or Kowalskis, etc, the poverty problem would be fixed, or at the very least, helped significantly without forcing ANYBODY to do ANYTHING.

    But then again, these people would rather force everyone to pony up the dough rather than take a hit to their lifestyles.

    Charity is a beautiful thing, but forced charity?




    2004 Ford Freestar Minivan. 2004 Ford Freestar - Quality
  • 2004 Ford Freestar - Quality


  • dime21
    Apr 15, 03:42 PM
    http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/06/testing-real-world-speed-of-usb-3-0-hard-drives/

    That is horrible scaling given that USB 2.0 lasted 10 years.
    Of course, what did you expect from an interface designed for keyboards, joysticks, and mice?

    Even USB 2.0 has a pathetic 50% effective utilization rate, while Firewire is ~95%. USB 2.0 is 480 Mb/s, which equals 60 MB/s, yet in real world speeds, you're lucky if you see 30 MB/s - HALF it's rated bandwidth. USB is just plain horrible for bulk data transfer, and the new 3.0 iteration is no different. The protocol overhead is atrocious.

    Of course USB also operates in slow horrible PIO mode, meaning it has to run everything through the host CPU. PATA, SATA, SCSI, Firewire, and Thunderbolt all operate in DMA mode, bypassing the host CPU for much much faster transfers.




    2004 Ford Freestar Minivan. 2004 Ford Freestar SE,
  • 2004 Ford Freestar SE,


  • CQd44
    Apr 30, 06:24 PM
    I think it will be just as big as USB2 was. Why wouldn't it? I would be surprised if all the PC vendors shipped machines with TB, if history is any indication. Far more Windows PC's were shipped with USB2 than FW. That may change this time around with TB but I doubt it.

    My desktop has eSATA and USB 2 built into the case (of course this requires some plugging in on the motherboard itself...) and the motherboard supports firewire.

    I think what will probably happen is just switching to USB3 and TB. Seems easiest and the most backward-compatible.

    I can't wait to get a USB3 flash drive so my laptop can finally put its USB3 to use :)




    2004 Ford Freestar Minivan. 2004 Ford Freestar Wagon
  • 2004 Ford Freestar Wagon


  • Synapple
    Sep 1, 07:15 AM
    Ok..You got me..
    What I meant was Tuesday was Sept. 12th in Cupertino..NOT monday as the poster said.;)

    Yeah I got that ;)
    I was just euphoric due to the news of an upcoming Apple event and a couple of Pina Coladas... :o




    2004 Ford Freestar Minivan. Ford Freestar Minivan. 2004
  • Ford Freestar Minivan. 2004


  • PlaceofDis
    Nov 13, 04:07 PM
    Because they are NO LONGER USING THE API! They give the rights to use the API to call and display the image. It doesn't give them the right to take that image and use it for something else outside of the context it was meant to be used.

    they are using the OS X API in the context it was meant to be used in. as far as i can tell these images aren't loaded into the iPhone application itself and are rather transmitted over-the-air as the application is being used, thus they are being called by the OS while the application is being run and are merely being displayed through the iPhone application, its like saying you can't see any apple trademark icons through a VPN client.




    2004 Ford Freestar Minivan. 2006 Ford Freestar Minivan
  • 2006 Ford Freestar Minivan


  • anthonylambert
    Apr 19, 08:02 AM
    This is the GUI wars all over again... Last time Apple sued Microsoft for copying their GUI desktop to make Windows....

    (and no Xerox didn't invent that they invented windowing not really a desktop Apple did that bit.)

    Anyway Apple lost and Microsoft took over the world while Apple dwindled to a market share of less than 5%.

    I don't think they want that to happen this time....




    2004 Ford Freestar Minivan. 2004 Ford Freestar
  • 2004 Ford Freestar


  • steviem
    Apr 11, 03:47 PM
    How many pints to a league does your car do?




    2004 Ford Freestar Minivan. Pictures of 2004 FORD FREESTAR LIMITED MINI-VAN*DVD ENT SYSTEM*LEATHER*CARFAX*CALL
  • Pictures of 2004 FORD FREESTAR LIMITED MINI-VAN*DVD ENT SYSTEM*LEATHER*CARFAX*CALL


  • syklee26
    Sep 12, 06:50 PM
    can someone tell me how to do that quick scroll thingee? i get it sorta randomly.




    2004 Ford Freestar Minivan. 2004 Ford Freestar Minivan
  • 2004 Ford Freestar Minivan


  • JGowan
    Sep 19, 09:02 PM
    FWIW $50M/year is ~0.2% of Disney's revenue (they made ~$30B/year for the past few years). Definitely not chicken feed, but not earth shattering either.BConsidering that they sold "010101010's", I think an extra $50M is extraordinary. Apple ripped 75 DVDs, made a few web pages and boom... $1M in 7 days! I don't know what you're talking about... you're thinking small... $50M/YR is JUST THE BEGINNING.




    2004 Ford Freestar Minivan. ford freestar
  • ford freestar


  • Multimedia
    Sep 9, 02:39 PM
    Yes an OS issue.

    http://www.math.purdue.edu/~abarreno/affinitydlg.gifWow so if that's in XP already it's gotta be a feature in Leopard.

    You call that Application Core Affinity or what's the correct full termonology? And where in the OS do you choose the applications to assign x number of cores with that dialog box. Looks like they're ready for a lot of cores coming up?!?! :eek:

    32. I'd say that's planning ahead.

    Are we hijacking this thread? Don't mean to go so far Off Topic folks. :D




    2004 Ford Freestar Minivan. 2004 FORD FREESTAR MINIVAN
  • 2004 FORD FREESTAR MINIVAN


  • HecubusPro
    Aug 28, 08:44 PM
    I really hope it takes until november or december. Watching you all squirm and making positive posts predicting a swift release for your own peace of mind is entertaining, and probably educational.

    Then this is the place to be right now if you want to see a lot of people squirming with anticipation. Unfortunately, the C2D will be shipping in select Mac systems in the next two to three weeks, so you're entertainment will be short lived. Sorry. But until that time, have a good time. :p




    2004 Ford Freestar Minivan. 2004 FORD FREESTAR MINIVAN
  • 2004 FORD FREESTAR MINIVAN


  • Eidorian
    Sep 9, 02:40 PM
    Wow so if that's in XP already it's gotta be a feature in Leopard.

    You call that Application Core Affinity or what's the correct full termonology? And where in the OS do you choose the applications to assign x number of cores with that dialog box. Looks like they're ready for a lot of cores coming up?!?! :eek:

    32. I'd say that's planning ahead.I think it might be in Windows 2000 as well. It's found via Task Manager under Processes. Right click on a process in the list and you can assign its affinity. Some programs crash when the encounter hyper threading or multi core machines. So you have to assign the process to a single CPU/core. More then likely on a dual processor machine from back then a multi-core one.




    2004 Ford Freestar Minivan. Pictures of 2004 Ford Freestar
  • Pictures of 2004 Ford Freestar


  • spencers
    Apr 11, 11:30 AM
    AMAZING!!!!!!
    I'm very excited to see this come to XBMC. Cannot wait!




    0815
    Apr 20, 01:55 PM
    I don't usually read SLA's, but it's all right there, Page 1, Section 4, subsection b. And if don't want your iPhone to collect this data, turn off the feature.

    http://images.apple.com/legal/sla/docs/iphone4.pdf

    http://images.apple.com/legal/sla/docs/iPadSoftwareLicense.pdf

    Interesting find - but it seems that it is not possible to turn just the data collection in the center of this discussion off. You can only turn everything off or specific apps (but I don't think I saw this one listed somewhere as an app)




    spicyapple
    Sep 10, 08:31 AM
    Things have certainly changed after the PPC ->x86 transition.
    Mac resale value will go down the drain, but that's great if you're the buyer not the seller. It's still much more exciting to be getting these furious CPU upgrades.




    kansast
    Sep 13, 09:52 PM
    But why should it? This isn't Motorola... this is Apple. They are supposed to be the masters of industrial design and software integration. No doubt the phone will have an awesome user interface, but I expect more from Apple than sticking an antenna and GSM chip inside a nano, putting a keypad underneath it, and calling it a day. This couldn't have taken very long to dream up... it seems like the most obvious and un-Apple idea of them all.

    If this is the fabled iPhone then Apple is losing its touch... the design was already done when they introduced the nano.

    I hope Apple wants this to be a phone with iPod functionality opposed to a nano with phone functionallity. The difference is huge. What is the primary function of this device? To play music or use as a phone? Thus far it looks like a nano with a software update and a GSM chip sadly.

    that's just it.. if it is an ipod/iphone.. any phone with a slide out keyboard, which apparently is getting to be popular.. and has a limited number of buttons ALWAYS available.. then on the iPHone those limited buttons are created using the iPod clickwheel.. so for me, I think it could be brilliant. ANd by now we all know how to use the clickwheel, without even looking at it.




    MattyMac
    Sep 15, 06:38 PM
    not too bad...wish it was alot sooner, but I guess I'll have to wait:(




    Unorthodox
    Sep 14, 03:14 PM
    September 25th (http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/09/14/photokina/index.php).
    Not the 24th.



    Walang komento:

    Mag-post ng isang Komento